PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 9, 2025Biomedicines2 citationsOpen Access

Preclinical Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes: Reality or Utopia

View Full Paper
TMTatiana Alekseevna MarakhovskayaDTD TabakovОГО. В. Глушкова

Key Points

  • Current biomarkers for type 1 diabetes lack sufficient evidence for early diagnostics, highlighting a critical gap.
  • Advancements in next-generation sequencing have identified polygenic risk scores linked to type 1 diabetes, but no definitive predictive biomarkers exist.
  • Emerging biomarkers, such as cytokines and cfDNA, exhibit potential for diagnostics but are largely limited to research contexts.
  • Integrating traditional autoimmune diabetes markers with new approaches can improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for early disease detection.

Abstract

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of pancreatic β-cells, predominantly manifesting in childhood or adolescence. The lack of clearly interpretable biological markers in the early stages, combined with the insidious onset of the disease, poses significant challenges to early diagnosis and the implementation of preventive strategies. The applicability of classic T1D biomarkers for understanding the mechanisms of the autoimmune process, preclinical diagnostics and treatment efficiency is limited. Despite advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, which have enabled large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and the identification of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) associated with T1D predisposition, as well as progress in bioinformatics approaches for assessing dysregulated gene expression, no universally accepted risk assessment model or definitive predictive biomarker has been established. Until now, the use of new promising biomarkers for T1D diagnostics is limited by insufficient evidence base. However, they have great potential for the development of diagnostic methods on their basis, which has been shown in single or serial large-scale studies. This critical review covers both well-known biomarkers widely used in clinical practice, such as HLA-haplotype, non-HLA SNPs, islet antigen autoantibodies, C-peptide, and the promising ones, such as cytokines, cfDNA, microRNA, T1D-specific immune cells, islet-TCR, and T1D-specific vibrational bands. Additionally, we highlight new approaches that have been gaining popularity and have already demonstrated their potential: GWAS, single-cell transcriptomics, identification of antigen-specific T cells using scRNA-seq, and FTIR spectroscopy. Although some of the biomarkers, in our opinion, are still limited to a research context or are far from being implemented in clinical diagnostics of T1D, they have the greatest potential of being applied in clinical practice. When integrated with the monitoring of the classical autoimmune diabetes markers, they would increase the sensitivity and specificity during diagnostics of early and preclinical stages of the disease. This critical review aims to evaluate the current landscape of classical and emerging biomarkers in autoimmune diabetes, with a focus on those enabling early detection—prior to extensive destruction of pancreatic islets. Another goal of the review is to focus the attention of the scientific community on the gaps in early T1D diagnostics, and to help in the selection of markers, targets, and methods for scientific studies on creating novel diagnostic panels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marakhovskaya et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70dab90569dd607ee5de5https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13102444
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper