Systematic review finds inconsistent evidence on adiponectin levels in preeclampsia, suggesting complex biomarker interactions.
Background/Objectives: Classified as a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, preeclampsia is one of the leading causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The abnormal trophoblast invasion that leads to a failed transformation of the uterine spiral arteries during placentation remains the most probable cause for preeclampsia. It is known that adiponectin acts on the placenta, playing a regulatory role in placentation processes. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to compile scientific evidence to evaluate the role of adiponectin as a biomarker for preeclampsia. Methods: The protocol for this systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO database (ID CRD42024542403) and follows the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Overall, twenty-nine studies were selected from the PubMed and Scopus databases, including case–control, prospective and retrospective cohort, cross-sectional, and bidirectional Mendelian randomization studies. Results: From the articles analyzed, nine studies indicated an increase in adiponectin levels in preeclampsia, eleven reported a decrease, eight detected no significant changes, and in two studies, it was not possible to determine the glycoprotein levels. Analysis of the evidence quality revealed that moderate and low evidence levels predominate, with stronger evidence for decreased adiponectin levels. Conclusions: Promoting the advancement of scientific research is crucial, particularly exploring the association between adiponectin and other biomarkers. This approach could facilitate the development of screening and diagnostic methods, enabling the implementation of specific preventive and therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrilho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: