Pilot study evaluates chatgpt acceptance in Sabah educators, indicating encouraging attitudes and mixed institutional support.
This pilot study investigates educators’ acceptance of ChatGPT in Sabah’s higher education institutions using the Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3) framework. A cross-sectional survey of 27 educators assessed six constructs: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived credibility, social influence, privacy concerns, and behavioural intention. Results demonstrated excellent overall reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.891), with construct reliabilities ranging from 0.718 to 0.854. Educators showed positive attitudes towards ChatGPT’s usefulness (M = 3.68) and ease of use (M = 3.75), with moderate privacy concerns (M = 3.42). Strong correlations emerged between perceived credibility and behavioural intention (r = 0.72, p < 0.001), perceived usefulness and intention (r = 0.68, p < 0.001), and ease of use and intention (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). High variability in colleague encouragement (SD = 1.07) indicates inconsistent institutional support. This study validates the TAM3 instrument for ChatGPT research in Malaysian contexts and provides a foundation for larger mixed-methods investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: