Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis finds higher serum levels of enrofloxacin in olive baboons with oral administration, suggesting improved welfare outcomes.
Management of nonhuman primates (NHPs) in the laboratory setting is complex. Medical management often involves techniques aimed at minimizing the impact on the animals’ welfare, while considering the species-specific characteristics, research aims, and clinical needs of the patient. The current practice, at our institution, for administration of enrofloxacin has been to employ intramuscular injection, which may require brief restraint that can result in increased stress for the animal when applied throughout the course of a therapeutic regimen. Alternatively, oral dosing of standard veterinary tablet formulations has resulted in inconsistent administration, requiring supplementation with an injectable product if the animal becomes unwilling to take the medication. This inconsistency led us to investigate alternative methods of administration. Basing our efforts on previous work performed in macaques, we aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the injectable formulation of enrofloxacin when administered orally to one species of primate, the olive baboon ( Papio anubis ). Our work demonstrated that injectable enrofloxacin administered orally at 10 mg/kg resulted in higher serum levels than the intramuscular administration group for both enrofloxacin and its active metabolite, ciprofloxacin. In addition, our results support oral administration of enrofloxacin injectable product at intervals of up to once every 24 to 48 h when given at a dose of 10 mg/kg.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lane et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: