October 9, 2025Journal of Law Politic and HumanitiesOpen Access

Judges' Considerations On Traffic Accident Cases In Relation To The Law On Road Traffic And Transportation (Decision Study Number: 35/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Pwk)

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SBSampurna Sampurna BanyuajiMercu Buana University DGDeny GuntaraMercu Buana University MAMuhamad AbasMercu Buana University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

This analysis examines judges' considerations in traffic accident cases, highlighting sentencing discrepancies under Article 310 of transportation law.

Key Points

The study reveals a discrepancy between the maximum penalty of six years and the four-year sentence imposed on the negligent defendant.
Legal and non-legal considerations influenced the judge's lighter sentence despite the defendant violating Article 310, causing death.
Normative legal research methods were used to analyze Judgment No. 35/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Pwk in the context of road traffic law.
Findings suggest the imposed sentence conflicts with the intended legal spirit of Article 310(4) of the LLAJ Law.

Cite This Study

Banyuaji et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70db790569dd607ee6872 https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2410

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This analysis examines judges' considerations in traffic accident cases, highlighting sentencing discrepancies under Article 310 of transportation law.

Judges' Considerations On Traffic Accident Cases In Relation To The Law On Road Traffic And Transportation (Decision Study Number: 35/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Pwk)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Judges' Considerations On Traffic Accident Cases In Relation To The Law On Road Traffic And Transportation (Decision Study Number: 35/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Pwk)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider