PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2024Magnetic Resonance in Medicine10 citationsOpen Access

Anisotropy of T2 and T1ρ relaxation time in articular cartilage at 3 T

View Full Paper
VKVille KantolaOulu University of Applied SciencesJKJouni KarjalainenUniversity of OuluTJTomi JaakolaUniversity of Oulu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The anisotropy of R 2 and R 1ρ relaxation rates in articular cartilage contains information about the collagenous structure of the tissue. Here we determine and study the anisotropic and isotropic components of T 2 and T 1ρ relaxation parameters in articular cartilage with a clinical 3T MRI device. Furthermore, a visual representation of the topographical variation in anisotropy is given via anisotropy mapping. Methods Eight bovine stifle joints were imaged at 22 orientations with respect to the main magnetic field using T 2 , continuous‐wave (CW) T 1ρ , and adiabatic T 1ρ mapping sequences. Relaxation rates were separated into isotropic and anisotropic relaxation components using a previously established relaxation anisotropy model. Pixel‐wise anisotropy values were determined from the relaxation‐time maps using Michelson contrast. Results The relaxation rates obtained from the samples displayed notable variation depending on the sample orientation, magnetization preparation, and cartilage layer. R 2 demonstrated significant anisotropy, whereas CW‐R 1ρ (300 Hz) and CW‐R 1ρ (500 Hz) displayed a low degree of anisotropy. Adiabatic R 1ρ was largely isotropic. In the deep cartilage regions, relaxation rates were generally faster and more anisotropic than in the cartilage closer to the tissue surface. The isotropic relaxation rate components were found to have similar values regardless of measurement sequence. Conclusions The fitted relaxation model for T 2 and T 1ρ demonstrated varying amounts anisotropy, depending on magnetization preparation, and studied the articular cartilage layer. Anisotropy mapping of full joints showed varying amounts of anisotropy depending on the quantitative MRI parameter and topographical location, and in the case of T 2 , showed systematic changes in anisotropy across cartilage depth.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kantola et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70edbb6db643587687d99https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30096
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper