Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stable isotope fractionation of sulfur offers a window into Io's tidal heating history, which is difficult to constrain because Io's dynamic atmosphere and high resurfacing rates leave it with a young surface. We constructed a numerical model to describe the fluxes in Io's sulfur cycle using literature constraints on rates and isotopic fractionations of relevant processes. Combining our numerical model with measurements of the 34 S/ 32 S ratio in Io's atmosphere, we constrain the rates for the processes that move sulfur between reservoirs and model the evolution of sulfur isotopes over time. Gravitational stratification of SO 2 in the upper atmosphere, leading to a decrease in 34 S/ 32 S with increasing altitude, is the main cause of sulfur isotopic fractionation associated with loss to space. Efficient recycling of the atmospheric escape residue into the interior is required to explain the 34 S/ 32 S enrichment magnitude measured in the modern atmosphere. We hypothesize this recycling occurs by SO 2 surface frost burial and SO 2 reaction with crustal rocks, which founder into the mantle and/or mix with mantle‐derived magmas as they ascend. Therefore, we predict that magmatic SO 2 plumes vented from the mantle to the atmosphere will have lower 34 S/ 32 S than the ambient atmosphere, yet are still significantly enriched compared to solar‐system average sulfur. Observations of atmospheric variations in 34 S/ 32 S with time and/or location could reveal the average mantle melting rate and hence whether the current tidal heating rate is anomalous compared to Io's long‐term average. Our modeling suggests that tides have heated Io for >1.6 Gyr if Io today is representative of past Io.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hughes et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: