There is an error in Step 3 of the proof of the Lemma 4.8 of the original paper.In the new version this error is corrected by using the fact that for t large enough the control constraint becomes inactive.Lemma 4.8 Let assumptions (A) hold and let ( ȳ, ū), and p denote a local solution and associated adjoint state to (P) corresponding to an initial datum y 0 ∈ B Y ( δ2 ).Then, possibly after further reduction of V , the mappingProof Step1 : For β ∈ V , with V as in Remark 4.2, let (y (β) , u (β) , p (β) , p 1(β) ) be the solution to T (y, u, p, p 1 ) = β.As a consequence of (A5) it is also a solution to T (y, u, p, p(0)) = β with p (β) ∈ W ∞ .Thus the first two equations of this latter equality can be expressed as (4.35a)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunisch et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: