A computational model simulates progressive damage in fiber-reinforced composites, indicating behavior under tensile loading.
A computational model was developed to simulate the progressive damage sustained by unidirectional fiber-reinforced, brittle-matrix composites in tensile loading parallel to the fibers. In addition to the constituent and interface properties, the model used a size-distribution of ‘fiber-free zones’ as potential sites for the development of small penny-shaped cracks. Stable extension of these non-steady-state cracks and the transition from non-steady-state to steady-state were modeled using a stress-intensity formulation for a partially-bridged, penny-shaped crack. Stress-strain relation was simulated by calculating the total engineering strain in the gage section as a function of the applied stress. Strain energies of the non-steady-state cracks and displacements of the fibers in the sliding zones of the steady-state cracks were calculated separately to estimate the total strain. Two unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites were used to test the predictive capability of the model. The stress-strain relation predicted by the model was in good agreement with that measured experimentally for a SiC(fiber)-reinforced calcium aluminosilicate (CAS) composite. A SiC(fiber)-reinforced magnesium aluminosilicate (MAS) composite showed less cumulative strain before fracture due to premature fiber failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chao et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: