Aim: The goal of the research was to assess fracture resistance of temporary restoration materials that will be fabricated with 3D printed technique and CAD/CAM technique in different oral media (artificial saliva, tea, carbonated orange juice).Methods: According to the sample size calculation, 40-crown-shaped samples were divided into two groups (n=20); group I was manufactured by CAD/CAM, and group II was manufactured by 3D printing technology. Each group was subdivided into four subgroups (n=5). According to the immersion solution, subgroup (A) Artificial saliva, subgroup (B) Tea, subgroup (c) Carbonated orange juice, and subgroup (D) the control (non-immersion). The prepared model was scanned using an extra-oral scanner. Interim crowns were designed using 3Shape software. STL file was Produced and sent to both milling machine and printer. . All samples then were immersed in the different oral media for 7 days. Finally all samples were subjected to fracture resistance testing by using universal testing machine. The data collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed.Results: Results of the fracture resistance in control group showed higher non-statistically significant difference in cad cam technique (1262.8±580.68)than 3d printing technique(817.98±78.48) ,While after immersion in different oral media the fracture resistance samples of cad cam showed higher statistically significant different (1012.56±363.97) than in 3d printing (594.9 ± 163.1). Conclusion: The total fracture resistance of milled temporary crowns showed higher fracture resistance than 3D printing technique in different oral media with statistically significant difference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
mohamed et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: