Interaction of left ventricular size with the outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy in Japanese patients

Background We analyzed the influence of the QRS duration (QRSd) to LV end‐diastolic volume (LVEDV) ratio on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes in heart failure patients classified as III/IV per the New York Heart Association (NYHA) and with small body size. Hypothesis We proposed the hypothesis that the QRSd/LV size ratio is a better index of the CRT substrate. Methods We enrolled 114 patients with advanced heart failure (NYHA class III/IV, and LV ejection fraction >35%) who received a CRT device, including those with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRSd ≥120 milliseconds ( n = 60), non‐LBBB and QRSd ≥150 milliseconds ( n = 30) and non‐LBBB and QRSd of 120−149 milliseconds ( n = 24). Results Over a mean follow‐up period of 65 ± 58 months, the incidence of the primary endpoint, a composite of all‐cause death and hospitalization for heart failure, showed no significant intergroup difference (43.3% vs. 50.0% vs. 37.5%, respectively, p = .72). Similarly, among 104 patients with QRSd/LVEDV ≥ 0.67 ( n = 54) and QRSd/LVEDV < 0.67 ( n = 52), no significant differences were observed in the incidence of the primary endpoint (35.1% vs. 51.9%, p = .49). Nevertheless, patients with QRSd/LVEDV ≥ 0.67 showed better survival than those with QRSd/LVEDV < 0.67 (14.8% vs. 34.6%, p = .0024). Conclusion Advanced HF patients with a higher QRSd/LVEDV ratio showed better survival in this small‐body–size population. Thus, the risk is concentrated among those with a larger QRSd, and patients with a relatively smaller left ventricular size appeared to benefit from CRT.