Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Cervical cancer is a disease of major public health significance which can be prevented by adequate screening. Objective: This study assessed the level of cervical cancer knowledge, attitude to screening and human papillomavirus testingexperience in women who self-sampled for cervical cancer screening. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study involving 790 women that had human papilloma virus (HPV) testing at the gynae-oncology unit of the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital. Participants were assessed of their cervical cancer screeningknowledge, attitude and HPV testing experience. High risk HPV (hr-HPV) nucleic acid testing was funded by the Clinton HealthAccess Initiative. Results: Majority (76.71%) of the respondents exhibited a high level of knowledge of cervical cancer, its causes, risk factors andprevention; and a positive experience with HPV self-sampling reported in 98.1%. hr-HPV positive rate was 13.4%. The mostcommon reason (43%) for not having a cervical screening done was lack of a doctor’s request. The most commonly knownmethod of cervical screening by the respondents was Pap Smear test (55.31%). Conclusion: There is need for more education to improve the level of awareness and uptake of hr-HPV testing for cervicalcancer in Lagos. Health care providers are not offering cervical cancer screening enough and this needs to be explored more infuture studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olumodeji et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: