The present study objective was to validate the criteria of an instrument created for quality assurance of teacher induction programs. It was applied research with a mixed-method approach. The sample was non-probabilistic for convenience. The instrument was constructed based on the available bibliography, and the content was validated by expert judgment through a Likert scale with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86. Aiken's V was applied to the experts' judgment. The 14 criteria relevance had an average approval of 80.6% vs. 3.6% of disapproval, and, according to Aiken's V, all items should be included in the final version of the scale. In conclusion, the E-Tip criteria resulted in being valid in content validation. In addition, further investigation needs to be done concerning qualitative instruments to assess the mentioned criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeomans‐Cabrera et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: