In this model, articles are published throughout the year at regular intervals, and the papers for the year are then presented at an annual conference.Reviewers can request revisions of submitted articles, which may then be revised and resubmitted in the same year.PoPETs publishes four issues per year.By enabling resubmission across these issues, PoPETs provides a high-quality peer-review process that enables authors and reviewers to work together to produce and recognize significant scholarly contributions.The PoPETs double-blind peer-review process is similar to other top-tier computer-security publications.The process includes initial review by the Editors-in-Chief for rules compliance and in-scope content, written reviews by multiple independent reviewers, author rebuttal, discussion among reviewers, and consensus decisions with disagreements resolved by the Editors-in-Chief or the Vice Chairs.The output of the review process is a set of reviews, a meta-review summarizing the reviewers' opinions after discussion (for papers that are not rejected during the first round), and one of the following decisions: Accept, Accept with Minor
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sherr et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: