A field experiment was conducted at agronomy research farm of Acharya Narendra Deva University & technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya (U.P.) during Rabi season (2021-22). The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. There were ten treatments i.e. [T1] Clodinafop @ 60 g a.i. ha-1, [T2] Sulfosulfuron @ 25 g a.i. ha-1, [T3 ] Metsulfuron @ 4 g a.i. ha-1, [T4] Carfentrazone ethyl @ 20 g a.i. ha-1 and tank mixture of [T5] Clodinafop + Metsulfuron @ (60+4) 64 g a.i. ha-1, [T6] Clodinafop + Carfentrazone @ (60+20) 80 g a.i. ha-1, [T7] Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ (30+2) 32 g a.i. ha-1, [T8] Sulfosulfuron + Carfentrazone (25+20) 45g a.i. ha-1, [T9] Weed free were evaluated against mixed weed flora in wheat except and [T10] Weedy check. The result revealed that all the growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of wheat is obtained significantly higher under [T9] weed free treatment but statistically at par with [T7] Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ (30+2) 32 g a.i. ha-1, [T5] Clodinafop + Metsulfuron @ (60+4) 64 g a.i. ha-1, [T6] Clodinafop + Carfentrazone (60+20) 80 g a.i. ha-1, [T8] Sulfosulfuron + Carfentrazone (25+20) 45g a.i. ha-1. The highest net return (81054.50 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.04) was recorded under Sulfosulfuron + Metsulfuron @ (30+2) 32 g a.i. ha-1, It was close to Clodinafop + Metsulfuron @ (60+4) 64 g a.i. ha-1. Thus, it may be recommended for highest yield of wheat and net return.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yadav et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: