Background/Aims Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disorder characterised by the formation of non-caseating granulomas, and can affect almost any organ, ranging from self-limiting to a chronic and progressive disease. There are no validated biomarkers that help establish diagnosis or monitor disease progression. Serum Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) is used in clinical practice despite some studies reporting a poor reflection of disease activity. Soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) is being used with increasing frequency and may be a useful tool in establishing diagnosis and monitoring disease progression. Our objectives were to evaluate the use of ACE and sIL2-R in a large tertiary cohort of patients with multisystem sarcoidosis. Methods This was an observational cohort study. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sarcoidosis at King’s College Hospital between 2013 and 2023 were identified. Demographics, symptoms onset, clinical features, ACE, sIL2-R, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), histology and immunomodulating therapy were extracted from electronic health records. Cross sectional correlations between ACE and sIL2-R was assessed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs). Results Data were extracted for 196 individuals diagnosed with sarcoidosis. The mean age was 55 (SD 16) with a female and black predominance (table 1). A prior exposure risk of silica or dust was identified in 5 individuals. At diagnosis the most frequently reported organ involvement was lung (65%), eye (20%), musculoskeletal (13%) and skin (12%). Organ involvement on PET-CT was seen in 77%. 22% had interstitial lung disease (ILD) confirmed on HRCT and 3% had myocarditis on cardiac MRI. Steroids were commenced in 56%, with a mean dose of 19mg (SD 13mg). The mean duration of follow up was 7 years (IQR 2.9-14.4), 11% developed symptoms suggestive of new organ involvement, 7% had PET-CT evidence of new organ involvement, 4% had evidence of ILD progression and 14% underwent re-initiation or escalation of steroid therapy. 42% (n = 82) had results for both sIL2-R and ACE biomarkers. The median ACE was 55u/L (IQR 40-83) and sIL2-R 1781ng/L (IQR 1328-2436). 50% (41/82) had a sIL2-R >1800ng/L and 59% (48/82) had an ACE >50u/L. Interestingly, 32% (13/41) with a sIL2-R >1800 had a normal ACE and 42% (20/41) with an ACE >50 had a normal sIL2-R results. sIL2-R correlated with ACE (rs = 0.34, p = 0.0018). There was no significant difference in ACE levels in those taking ACE inhibitors (n = 9) compared to those (n = 73) not: 55u/L (IQR 41-83) versus 39u/L (IQR 30-65) p = 0.30. Conclusion sIL2-R significantly correlated with serum ACE, although the rs value is not particularly strong, suggesting other factors may be influencing the relationship. These biomarkers represent different aspects of the disease; serum ACE reflects granulomatous inflammation whilst sIL2-R implies immune system activation and T-cell involvement, which may explain our findings. Disclosure M. Hughes: None. K. Bechman: Honoraria; UCB, Viforpharma. Grants/research support; NIHR, Versus Arthritis/Pfizer. R. Roy: None. M. Omar: None. D. Mehta: None. D. Nagra: None. S. Walsh: None. S.S. Birring: None. D.M. Sado: None. P.A. Brex: None. J. Galloway: Honoraria; Abbvie, Biovitrum, Bristol Myers Squib (BMS), Celgene, Chugai, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, UCB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hughes et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: