Introduction COVID-19 is a complex multisystemic disease. Many studies have described the multifaceted role of the endothelium in the pathophysiology of COVID-19. Emerging evidence suggests that endotheliitis in arteries may be a contributing factor of morbidity and mortality in COVID-19. Methods In this study 89 participants infected with COVID-19 were categorised into two groups: non-hospitalised patients (N=33, mean age = 49±9.7 yrs) and hospitalised patients (N=56, mean age = 60±12.2 yrs). All participants underwent arterial stiffness assessment, endothelial function tests and microvascular function tests using non-invasive techniques such as SphygmoCor, EndoPAT and moorFLPI-2 respectively. These tests were performed at visit 1 (£3 months after infection) and visit 2 (³6 months after infection). Results The Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (cfPWV, a measure of arterial stiffness) was significantly higher in hospitalised patients than non-hospitalised patients at both visit 1 (hospitalised cfPWV: 8.1±1.3 m/s vs non-hospitalised cfPWV: 7.0±1.3 m/s, p=0.03) and visit 2 (hospitalised cfPWV: 8.7±1.4 m/s vs non-hospitalised cfPWV: 7.3±1.4 m/s, p=0.012). EndoPAT analysis revealed that hospitalised patients demonstrated poorer endothelial function compared to non-hospitalised patients (hospitalised: RHI = 2.0±0.8 vs non-hospitalised: RHI =2.4±0.7, p=0.028). Furthermore, moorFLPI-2 tests showed that hospitalised patients had higher baseline skin perfusion (p=0.035) and decreased responses to endothelial-dependent (acetylcholine (ACh), visit 1 p=0.019 and visit 2 p<0.001) and endothelial-independent (sodium nitroprusside (SNP), visit 1, p=0.026) vasodilators. Interestingly, hospitalised patients also displayed a progressive deterioration in vasodilatory response to ACh between visit 1 and visit 2 (p=0.036). Conclusion The results from this study illustrate that severe COVID-19 infections which require hospitalisation are associated with arterial stiffness and poor endothelial function. A limitation of this study which was considered when interpreting the results was age-matching as the hospitalised patients were significantly older compared to non-hospitalised patients. Nonetheless, the progressive deterioration of microvascular function seen in severely affected patients between visits was independent of age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammad et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: