Pulmonary artery catheter and veno-arterial ECMO training for cardiology fellows: evaluation of a simulation-based program

Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Proficiency in pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy is crucial for delivering high-quality critical care and improving patient outcomes in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs). Both procedures are conducive to immersive simulation training. Our study focuses on evaluating the efficacy of a simulation-based training program in these specific domains for cardiology fellows. Methods Cardiology fellows participated in two blended learning courses: one on PAC and one on veno-arterial ECMO. The PAC course consisted of a pre-course test of 12 multiple-choice questions assessing knowledge of indications, contraindications, and interpretation of PAC, a 45-minute didactic lecture, followed by a case-based, hands-on simulation training session for 60 minutes. The ECMO course consisted of a pre-course test of 15 multiple-choice questions assessing indications, contraindications, ECMO physiology, and circuit management, a 30-minute didactic lecture, followed by a case-based, hands-on simulation training session. Fellows completed a multiple-choice post-course test within 72 hours post-simulation training. All test questions were designed by experts in cardiac critical care. Results A total of 18 cardiology fellows completed the PAC simulation and 16 completed the ECMO simulation. For the PAC group the average score on the pre-exam was 60%, while on the post exam, the average score increased significantly to 86%, representing a 26% increase (p=0.04). For the ECMO training, the average score on the pre-exam was 67%, and on the post exam, the average score increased substantially to 90% in the ECMO exam, there was a 23% increase in the average post-exam score compared to the pre exam was recorded (p=0.05). Conclusion Simulation-based training in PAC and ECMO has a highly positive impact on the knowledge acquisition of cardiology fellows, with statistically significant increases in average post-exam scores in both areas. These findings not only validate the value of immersive simulation-based training programs but also underscore the need for further investigation into the implementation of educational initiatives aimed at enhancing care in cardiogenic shock.