Introduction Intranasal esketamine has been approved as a treatment for patients with treatment-resistant depression. We analyzed the results of its efficacy in 15 patients. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of intranasal Esketamine as a treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression Methods Case series Results For the last 8 months, since the treatment with intranasal esketamine was approved for resistant depression, we have treated 14 patients with this drug. Through this process, we followed a standardized method consisting in the following steps: On the first esketamine session (DAY 1) the patient has to fill a CGI and a MADRS scale. On the second esketamine session (DAY 7) the patient has to fill a CGI, a MADRS scale, a form about the level of satisfaction with the drug and a last form in which they can include the secondary effects. On week 6 since the start of the treatment, the patient has to fill again a CGI, a MADRS scale, a form about the level of satisfaction with the drug and a last form in which they can include the secondary effects. In the 6th month since the start of the treatment, the patient has to fill again a CGI, a MADRS scale, a form about the level of satisfaction with the drug and a last form in which they can include the secondary effects they have perceived. We analyzed and compared all of the previous data and obtained the following results: At day 7: 64% of the patients had a response in the form of improvement, of which 66% were feeling “slightly better” and 33% were feeling “better”. At week 6: 71% of the patients had a response in the form of improvement, of which 50% were feeling “slightly better” and the other 50% were feeling “better”. At month 6: only 28% of the patients completed the treatment; of which 100% had a response in the form of improvement: 50% were feeling “slightly better”, 25% were feeling “better” and 25% were feeling “far better”. Conclusions Although our data suggests that intranasal esketamine has been effective in short term depressive symptoms, we have yet no information about its medium and long-term efficacy or secondary effects. Nevertheless, other potential factors should be evaluated as they could affect the results in the long-term such as the difficulty in maintaining the treatment for more than 6 weeks. In addition, the patients who experienced the most improvement according to our data were patients with a TAB diagnosis, so this could be an interesting research focus. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marmisa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: