Objective: The Measure of Engagement, Independence, and Social Relationships (MEISR) is a tool designed to assess the engagement, independence, and social interactions of infants and toddlers during daily activities. This study aimed to develop Korean version of MEISR (K-MEISR) and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods: Korean version of MEISR was developed through the translation and modification of items of the MEISR following a pilot study (N = 44). Two studies were conducted with parents of infants and toddlers up to 36 months old using online (N = 124) and offline (N = 134) versions. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0 and AMOS 25.0. Item difficulty and discrimination, as well as passing rates were calculated; and internal consistency, correlations among the routine and total scales, factor analyses, and correlations with K-DST ratings were analyzed to determine the reliability and validity of K-MEISR. Results: Analyses of item difficulty and passing rates identified characteristics of items for determining the item order for K-MEISR. High correlations between the total of each routine and the total of all items were found in both the online (r = .896~.992) and the offline (r = .874~.988) versions. Reliabilities of all total scale items were high for both the online (r = .998) and the offline (r = .997) versions. Reliabilities of routine items were also high, ranging from .913 to .985 for the online and .914 to .985 for the offline version. Correlations between K-DST and K-MEISR were high for both the online (r = .981) and offline (r = .959), showing high concurrent validity. Conclusions: The items of the total scale, and routines and functional domains showed high internal consistency and high correlations with K-DST, revealing the concurrent validity of K-MEISR. Recommendations for further research and clinical use of the assessment tool are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: