Kuteva, Aarts, et al. (2019) proposed a model of five different types of non-realization marking as a crosslinguistic category, i.e., apprehensional, avertive, frustrated initiation, frustrated completion, and inconsequential. This study describes the corresponding markers in Korean and suggests that a new category, i.e., oscillative-frustrative, be added to the non- realization typology. The developmental patterns of non-realization markers in Korean are largely consonant with the patterns reported in other languages, but a few unique instances are also observed. Most notably, Korean has a set of 'oscillative-frustratives', which is not subject to tense-restriction and encodes non-realization, signaling repeated movements towards the target and cessations thereof. This unique type warrants recognition as constituting a new category of non-realization marking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yae et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: