Graph labeling involves mapping the elements of a graph (edges and vertices) to a set of positive integers. The concept of an anti-magic super outer labeling (a,d)-H pertains to assigning labels to the vertices and edges of a graph using natural numbers {1,2,3,...,p+q}. The weights of the outer labels H form an arithmetic sequence {a,a+d,a+2d,...,a+(k-1)d}, where 'a' represents the first term, 'd' is the common difference, and 'k' denotes the total number of outer labels, with the smallest label assigned to a vertex. This study investigates the super (a,d)-P_2⨀P_m-antimagic total labeling of the corona product P_n⨀P_m, where n and m are both greater than or equal to 3. We define the labeling functions for vertices and edges based on the partitioning of labels into three subsets. Using k-balanced and (k,δ)-anti balanced multisets, we demonstrate that for m being odd, P_n⨀P_m is super (9m^2 n+4mn+m-n+3,1)-P_2 ⨀▒P_(m ) -antimagic, and for m being even, P_n⨀P_m is super (9m^2 n+4mn+m-2n+5,3)-P_2 ⨀▒P_(m ) -antimagic. The labeling scheme is illustrated through examples. For the case when m is odd, an antimagic total labeling of P_3 ⨀▒P_3 forms a super (282,1)- P_2 ⨀▒P_(3 ) -antimagic labeling. In the case of even m, an antimagic total labeling of P_3 ⨀▒P_(4 ) results in a super (483,3)- P_2 ⨀▒P_(4 ) -antimagic labeling. Both of these examples provide insights into the antimagic properties of corona products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yatin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: