Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This research was conducted to derive discussions on the concrete implementation strategies based on the consensus in the academic community about the necessity of the detective industry, which has been ongoing for a long time. To achieve the research objectives, a review of three bills pending in the current 21st National Assembly was conducted, and the case of Japan, which has implemented detective legislation ahead of us, was examined. Through this, the following conclusions were drawn. Firstly, provisions regarding the scope of business under exceptional prohibitionism; secondly, limitations on the discretion of the police chief according to the granularity and importance of violations subject to administrative disposition; thirdly, delegation of authority on committee composition; fourthly, establishment of provisions to ensure the effectiveness of refusal of registration due to physical or mental disabilities; fifthly, avoidance of excessive legislation on breaches of detective obligations. However, there are limitations to the research as specific methodologies have not been derived at the detailed level, and only rough directions for specific alternatives can be provided. Nevertheless, the significance of this research lies in the fact that it can be utilized as a reference in future bill drafting and can serve as a starting point for in-depth discussions on some of the alternatives proposed in this study.
Eun Kee Kim (Sat,) studied this question.