Survey study reveals shifts in public open space usage and spatial preferences in urban residents, highlighting evolving priorities for street enclosure and social life.
The COVID-19 pandemic that just passed has sparked widespread discussion about how the pandemic teaches new knowledge in the design of urban public spaces.Since the emergence of urban design theories for public open spaces, urban design has encouraged people to leave their homes for activities.However, the pandemic has threatened people's outdoor activities.The perception of public space is an important research area for designing quality cities that create comfortable and safe places for the community.It can determine what should be designed and how it should be designed.Therefore, this study aims to examine changes in people's perceptions of urban public open space usage and people's preference for urban design qualities for the sustainability of streets as public open spaces after the COVID-19 pandemic.Data collection applied an online survey method using questionnaires distributed among people in Malang City, Indonesia.One hundred and eight respondents participated in the survey.The questionnaire investigated the changing use of public open spaces and the most frequently visited public spaces before and after the pandemic.The study also explored the impact of the pandemic on people's preference for urban design qualities: enclosure, legibility, human scale, transparency, complexity, coherence, linkage, imageability, and social life.This study applied descriptive statistics and paired samples t-test to analyze the data.Results indicated significant changes in people's perceptions of urban public open space usage after the pandemic.The study also found significant differences in people's preference for urban design quality, especially the enclosure quality and the social life aspect of the public space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ernawati et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: