Hyperfocus (HF), or intense, deep concentration on a task, has gained significant research attention in recent years, particularly in regard to clinical populations such as Attention-Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The present work aims to provide validation of the 12-item Dispositional Adult Hyperfocus Questionnaire (AHQ-D) as a quantitative metric of HF in adults. We preregistered the study design and hypotheses. We administered the AHQ-D and several additional questionnaires to 347 adults (mean age 33 ± 11 years; 47% female). Exploratory factor analysis revealed high factor loadings (0.57-0.81) on a single HF factor; item response theory analysis suggested that the questionnaire items had high discrimination and covered a wide range of responses; and we report strong internal consistency metrics (Cronbach’s alpha 0.93, mean split-half reliability 0.93). Replicating our previous work, higher HF correlated with greater ADHD symptomology (r(345)=0.53), suggesting that HF may be related to ADHD traits (though in this sample we did not specifically recruit individuals with ADHD). The AHQ-D demonstrated the hypothesized convergent validity; higher HF on the AHQ-D correlated with higher HF measured using a different HF scale (r(344)=0.69), as well as higher flow (r(345)=0.12) and higher mind wandering (r(345)=0.39) scores. Higher AHQ-D HF scores showed a weak negative correlation with less grit (r(345)=-0.29). Though lower HF weakly correlated with higher social desirability response tendency (r(345)=-0.24), suggesting that those who care more about what others think may report less HF, there was no relationship between HF and extrasensory perception beliefs (r(345)=0.01), suggesting that participants were not simply biased in their response tendencies. Taken together, we demonstrate strong scale metrics for the AHQ-D, the expected convergent validity, and a general lack of response bias, in addition to replicating our previous association of HF with ADHD symptomology. We suggest that the AHQ-D can be confidently used in future work as a valid way to measure HF in adults, both in general populations and in clinical cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hupfeld et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: