Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To evaluate push out bond strength of Neosealer Flo bioceramic sealer in comparison to AH Plus sealer with different obturation techniques. Materials and methods: Twenty extracted human mandibular single-rooted premolar teeth were selected. After decoronation, samples were mechanically prepared then allocated randomly into two groups according to sealer type used for obturation Group I: AH Plus sealer Group II: Neosealer Flo and each group was further subdivided into two subgroups (n=5 per group) according to the obturation technique that was used as follows; Group I a and Group II a: obturated with single cone technique, Group I b and Group II b: obturated with continuous wave of compaction technique. After obturation three dentin slices with thickness of 2-mm were horizontally cut at 3,7, and 11mm length from the apex surface of each sample then push-out test was performed with universal testing machine. Results: AH Plus showed statistically significantly higher push-out bond strength than Neosealer Flo with CWC technique and no difference with SC technique. Conclusion: AH plus sealer had higher bond strength when used in CWC technique when compared to Neosealer flo sealer with no significant difference with SC technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menshawy et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: