A neural-network-based large eddy simulation is performed for flow over a circular cylinder. To predict the subgrid-scale (SGS) stresses, we train two fully connected neural network (FCNN) architectures with and without fusing information from two separate single-frame networks (FU and nFU, respectively), where the input variable is either the strain rate (SR) or the velocity gradient (VG). As the input variables, only the grid-filtered variables are considered for the SGS models of G-SR and G-VG, and both the grid- and test-filtered variables are considered for the SGS models of T-SR and T-VG. The training data are the filtered direct numerical simulation (fDNS) data at Red=3900 based on the free-stream velocity and cylinder diameter. Using the same grid resolution as that of the training data, the performances of G-SR and G-VG (grid-filtered inputs) and T-SR-FU and T-VG-FU (grid- and test-filtered inputs with fusion) are better than those of the dynamic Smagorinsky model and T-SR-nFU and T-VG-nFU (grid- and test-filtered inputs without fusion). These FCNN-based SGS models are applied to untrained flows having different grid resolutions from that of training data. Although the performances of G-SR and G-VG are degraded, T-SR-FU and T-VG-FU still provide good performances. Finally, T-SR-FU and T-VG-FU trained at Red = 3900 are applied to higher-Reynolds-number flows ( Red = 5000 and 10 000) and their results are also in good agreements with those of fDNS and previous experiment, indicating that adding the test-filtered variables and fusion increases the prediction capability even for untrained Reynolds number flows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: