In this book review, I explore Sally Swartz's contribution to the Routledge Introductions to Contemporary Psychoanalysis series on the topic of psychoanalysis and colonialism. I outline my original interest in this topic and how encountering Swartz's book has been both an enlightening and surprising experience regarding the latent biases within psychoanalytic theory and practice. I review some of the main themes and strengths of the book while also outlining a gap that could have been addressed with a more lengthy engagement with this topic. Fundamentally, Swartz's book is both a historical enquiry into the background of psychoanalysis and a call to action within the contemporary perimeters of psychoanalytic practice. In this important contribution to balancing the hierarchies of inequality and unilateral expression within psychoanalytic spaces, I argue that Swartz's book is critically important reading but also must be set within the context of the broader Lacanian scholarly field of psychoanalysis and colonialism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarah Meehan O’Callaghan (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: