Background Sacubitril/Valsartan is one of the pillars of heart failure (HF) management. Little is known about its uses or impact in real-world practice in the Indian population. We evaluated the effectiveness and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure in India. Methods This retrospective analysis involved newly diagnosed adult patients of HF (class I–IV, per physician clinical assessment and discretion), treated in a tertiary care hospital during period of February–April 2023 and received Sacubitril/Valsartan. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were measured in addition to demographics, clinical symptoms, comorbidities, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Following three months of Sacubitril/Valsartan medication, changes in LVEF, NT-proBNP levels, and clinical symptoms (graded from 1 to 10, with 10 being the maximum severity) were assessed. Results Out of 60 patients eligible for the study, 57% were males and 43% were females. Mean body weight was 60.26 ± 7.00 kg, while mean BP was 130/81 mmHg. 60% patients had both type 2 diabetes and hypertension as comorbidity. There was 23% improvement in LVEF (from mean LVEF of 34 to 42, P < .0001), with a significant decrease in NT-proBNP levels (mean 1220.5 pg/mL to 118.1 pg/mL, P < .0001) after treatment with Sacubitril/Valsartan for 3 months, resulted in marked improvement in clinical symptoms of breathlessness (mean score decreased from 6 to 2, P < .05), edema (mean score decreased from 5.5 to 1.8, P < .05) and palpitations (mean score decreased from 2.4 to 1.1, P < .05. 50 mg BD was the most commonly used dose of Sacubitril/Valsartan (70% patients), followed by 100 mg BD (25% patients) and rest (5%) with 200 mg BD dose. Treatment with Sacubitril/Valsartan was well tolerated, with <5% patients reporting hypotension. Conclusion The findings of this real-world study suggest Sacubitril/Valsartan was associated with an increase in ejection fraction translating into symptomatic improvement in Indian patients of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sachdeva et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: