This paper investigates the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and different phases within a firm's life cycle. Drawing on a sample of U.S. public firms spanning the period from 1991 to 2018, our empirical findings reveal distinct patterns: Younger firms with dual-class equity structures tend to allocate fewer resources to CSR initiatives compared to their single-class counterparts. However, as firms progress into the mature phase of their life cycle, dual-class firms exhibit superior CSR performance compared to single-class firms. Furthermore, we also observe that CEO compensation in dual-class firms tends to be higher during the mature phase. Those findings make a substantial contribution to the fields of agency theory, corporate governance, and business ethics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: