Aggression and prosociality, as social-emotional behaviors, are crucial for well-being, requiring further study on their interplay and cultural influences. We recruited 121 US (n = 71) and Taiwanese (n = 50) college students (M = 20.46 years) to understand the aggression-prosociality dynamic within individualistic-collectivistic contexts at both country and individual levels. Our novel experimental design differentiated between reactive and proactive behaviors, revealing a negative correlation in Taiwan—increased reactive prosociality correlates with decreased aggression in a uni-dimensional manner. Conversely, US data suggested a bi-dimensional relationship, where these behaviors function independently. Importantly, individual cultural orientations, especially horizontal collectivism, influenced the dynamic between uni-dimensional and bi-dimensional relationships of aggression and prosociality at the individual level, irrespective of group characteristics. This underscores that personal values about group harmony significantly predict the aggression-prosociality dynamic, highlighting the complexity of these dynamics across individual and country dimensions and paving the way for culturally tailored prevention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: