Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract It is often claimed that social media accelerate political extremism by employing personalization algorithms that filter users into groups with homogenous beliefs. While an intuitive position, recent research has shown that social media users exhibit self -filtering tendencies. In this paper, I apply Hannah Arendt’s theory of political judgment to hypothesize a cause for self-filtering on social media. According to Arendt, a crucial step in political judgment is the imagination of a general standpoint of distinct yet equal perspectives, against which individuals compare their own judgments in order to test their defensibility. I argue that social media inhibit this step by gamifying the pursuit of social status, which encourages users to consider the perspectives of others not for the sake of a general standpoint but for the sake of improving their social status, resulting in self-filtering. Consequently, ameliorating political extremism on social media requires not just reforming the algorithms that deliver content to users, but the interfaces on which users present their social identities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zachary Daus (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73091b6db6435876a9d18 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09759-5
Zachary Daus
Monash University
Ethics and Information Technology
Monash University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...