Background Patient‐focused outcomes present a central need for trial‐readiness across all ataxias. The Activities of Daily Living part of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS‐ADL) captures functional impairment and longitudinal change but is only validated in Friedreich Ataxia. Objective Validation of FARS‐ADL regarding disease severity and patient‐meaningful impairment, and its sensitivity to change across genetic ataxias. Methods Real‐world registry data of FARS‐ADL in 298 ataxia patients across genotypes were analyzed, including (1) cross‐correlation with FARS‐stage, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (PROM)‐ataxia, and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions visual analogue scale (EQ5D‐VAS); (2) sensitivity to change within a trial‐relevant 1‐year median follow‐up, anchored in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI‐C); and (3) general linear modeling of factors age, sex, and depression (nine‐item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ‐9]). Results FARS‐ADL correlated with overall disability (rho FARS‐stage = 0.79), clinical disease severity (rho SARA = 0.80), and patient‐reported impairment (rho PROM‐ataxia = 0.69, rho EQ5D‐VAS = –0.37), indicating comprehensive construct validity. Also at item level, and validated within genotype (SCA3, RFC1), FARS‐ADL correlated with the corresponding SARA effector domains; and all items correlated to EQ5D‐VAS quality of life. FARS‐ADL was sensitive to change at a 1‐year interval, progressing only in patients with worsening PGI‐C. Minimal important change was 1.1. points based on intraindividual variability in patients with stable PGI‐C. Depression was captured using FARS‐ADL (+0.3 points/PHQ‐9 count) and EQ5D‐VAS, but not FARS‐stage or SARA. Conclusion FARS‐ADL reflects both disease severity and patient‐meaningful impairment across genetic ataxias, with sensitivity to change in trial‐relevant timescales in patients perceiving change. It thus presents a promising patient‐focused outcome for upcoming ataxia trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Traschütz et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: