This article argues that the text of Accius 306-307 Dangel, as transmitted, cannot stand on grammatical grounds. It aims to clarify the use of the word cuiatis , propose an emendation of the text, and suggest a new explanation of the metre of the fragment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basil L.P. Nelis (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: