Purpose To compare the objective and subjective image quality and diagnostic performance for coronary stenosis of normal-dose model-based iterative reconstruction and reduced-dose super-resolution deep learning reconstruction in coronary CT angiography. Materials and Methods This single-center retrospective study included 52 patients (mean age, 68 years ± 10 [SD]; 41 men) who underwent serial coronary CT angiography and subsequent invasive coronary angiography between January and November 2022. The first 25 patients were scanned with a standard dose using model-based iterative reconstruction. The last 27 patients were scanned with a reduced dose using super-resolution deep learning reconstruction. Per-patient objective and subjective image qualities were compared. Diagnostic performance of model-based iterative reconstruction and super-resolution deep learning reconstruction to diagnose significant stenosis on coronary angiography was compared per-vessel using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Results The median tube current of super-resolution deep learning reconstruction was lower than that of model-based iterative reconstruction (median [IQR], 890 mA [680, 900] vs. 900 mA [895, 900], P = 0.03). Image noise of super-resolution deep learning reconstruction was lower than that of model-based iterative reconstruction (14.6 Hounsfield units ± 1.3 vs. 22.7 Hounsfield units ± 4.4, P < .001). Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction improved the overall subjective image quality compared with model-based iterative reconstruction (median [IQR], 4 [3, 4] vs 3 [3, 3], P = .006). No difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnosing coronary stenosis using super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99) and model-based iterative reconstruction (0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98; P = .98) was observed. Conclusion Our exploratory analysis suggests that super-resolution deep learning reconstruction could improve image quality with lower tube current settings than model-based iterative reconstruction with similar diagnostic performance to diagnose coronary stenosis in coronary CT angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomizawa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: