Has Approximate Machine Unlearning been evaluated properly? From Auditing to Side Effects

The growing concerns surrounding data privacy and security have underscored the critical necessity for machine unlearning--aimed at fully removing data lineage from machine learning models. MLaaS providers expect this to be their ultimate safeguard for regulatory compliance. Despite its critical importance, the pace at which privacy communities have been developing and implementing strong methods to verify the effectiveness of machine unlearning has been disappointingly slow, with this vital area often receiving insufficient focus. This paper seeks to address this shortfall by introducing well-defined and effective metrics for black-box unlearning auditing tasks. We transform the auditing challenge into a question of non-membership inference and develop efficient metrics for auditing. By relying exclusively on the original and unlearned models--eliminating the need to train additional shadow models--our approach simplifies the evaluation of unlearning at the individual data point level. Utilizing these metrics, we conduct an in-depth analysis of current approximate machine unlearning algorithms, identifying three key directions where these approaches fall short: utility, resilience, and equity. Our aim is that this work will greatly improve our understanding of approximate machine unlearning methods, taking a significant stride towards converting the theoretical right to data erasure into a auditable reality.