Abstract Obesity and cardiometabolic disease often, but not always, coincide. Distinguishing sub-populations within which cardiometabolic risk diverges from the risk expected for a given body mass index (BMI) may facilitate precision prevention of cardiometabolic diseases. Accordingly, we performed unsupervised clustering in four European population-based cohorts (N ~ 173K). We detected five discordant profiles consisting of individuals with cardiometabolic biomarkers higher or lower than expected given their BMI, in total representing ~20% of the total population. Persons with discordant profiles differed from concordant individuals in prevalence and future risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and diabetes. Subtle BMI-discordances in biomarkers affected disease risk. For instance, a 10% higher probability of having a discordant lipid profile was associated with a 5% higher risk of MACE (HR in women: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.06, p = 4.19x10-10; HR in men: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.06, p= 9.33x10-14). Multivariate prediction models for MACE and diabetes performed better when incorporating discordant profile information (likelihood ratio test P < 0.001). This enhancement represents an additional net benefit of 4 to 15 additional correct interventions, and 37 to 135 additional unnecessary interventions correctly avoided for every 10,000 individuals tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franks et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: