Introduction: A plethora of indices have been investigated as optimal measures of carbohydrate quality in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but a systematic comparison has not been conducted. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that not all carbohydrate quality indices are equally associated with the risk of T2D. Methods: We investigated associations between twenty-two carbohydrate quality variables and T2D risk among 212,883 US adults with up to 32y of follow-up in the ongoing Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), NHS II, and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We used multivariable and BMI-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Cereal fiber (comparing extreme quintiles of intake, RR:0.82, 95% CI:0.78, 0.87), whole fruit carbohydrates (RR:0.82, 95% CI:0.78, 0.87), glycemic index (RR:1.18, 95% CI:1.12, 1.24), and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) sugar (RR:1.23, 95% CI:1.17, 1.29) had the largest observed risk estimates of T2D (all P-trend<0.001). In addition, dietary glycemic load, starch, starchy vegetables, and potato and legume carbohydrates were positively associated (RR’s= 1.07 - 1.14), while whole grain carbohydrate intake was inversely associated with risk of T2D (RR= 0.94). Total and refined grain carbohydrates, added sugar, and non-starchy vegetables were not associated with risk of T2D. Ratios of carbohydrate or starch to total fiber or cereal fiber were all positively associated with risk of T2D (RR’s=1.11 - 1.33). The alternate Carbohydrate Quality Index (aCQI) (RR:0.73, 95% CI:0.69, 0.77) was more strongly associated with risk of T2D than the original CQI (RR:0.90, 95% CI:0.85, 0.95; both P-trend<0.001). Conclusion: Although many indices were associated with risk of T2D, higher intakes of cereal fiber and whole fruit carbohydrates, and lower intakes of glycemic index and sugar-sweetened beverage sugar had the lowest risk of T2D. The aCQI, comprising these four dietary variables and whole-grain carbohydrates, was strongly associated with risk of T2D and warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AlEssa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: