Introduction: Physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) are independently associated with cardiometabolic health; data on activity behaviors and cardiometabolic health among people living with HIV (PWH) are limited. Hypothesis: Activity behaviors would differ by age and that not meeting PA Guidelines would be associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases among PWH. Methods: Using NHANES 2007-08 through 2017-18, PWH (n=125; age 44.3 yrs) were characterized as emerging (18-29 yrs), early (30-44 yrs) and middle (45-59 yrs) adulthood. Achieving Guidelines (≥150 min/wk) was derived from self-reported PA across three domains. SB was reported as time spent sitting. Chronic conditions were high cholesterol, obesity, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Prevalence estimates of joint high SB (≥8 h/day) and inactivity (<10 min/wk) were calculated, and regression models were used to estimate differences in behaviors by age and investigate the association between achieving Guidelines and chronic conditions. Results: PWH reported 395.8 min/day of SB with 37.5% spending over 8 h/day sitting. There was no significant difference in SB across lifestage. A total of 67.2% achieved Guidelines although 14% were jointly inactive and highly sedentary. Compared with early adult PWH, middle adult PWH spent more time performing transport-related PA (β= 102.7 min/wk, p =0.009) and less time performing leisure-time PA (β= -211 min/wk, p =0.044) ( Figure ). Compared with PWH meeting Guidelines , those that did not meet Guidelines had higher diastolic blood pressure (β= 6.1 mmHg [CI: 2.6, 9.6]) and higher odds of obesity (OR=2.5[CI: 1.0, 6.4]). Conclusions: Domain-specific differences occurred in transportation and leisure time PA among PWH - a high-risk group for cardiovascular disease. Not meeting the Guidelines resulted in greater odds of obesity and higher diastolic blood pressure. Future research should incorporate device-based measures of movement to understand its relation to chronic disease in PWH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: