Large eddy simulation of flow past a cricket ball with its seam at 30^∘ to the free stream is carried out for 5 × 10⁴ ≤ Re ≤ 4.5 × 10⁵ . Three regimes of flow are identified on the basis of the time-averaged swing force coefficient ( C̄Z ) – no swing (NS), conventional swing (CS, C̄Z>0 ) and reverse swing (RS, C̄Z<0 ). The effect of seam on the boundary layer is investigated. Contrary to the popular belief, the boundary layer does not transition to a turbulent state in the initial stages of CS. The seam energizes the laminar boundary layer and delays its separation. The delay is significantly larger in a region near the poles, whose extent increases with an increase in $Re$ causing C̄Z to increase. Here C̄Z assumes a near constant value in the later stage of CS. The boundary layer transitions to a turbulent state via formation of a laminar separation bubble (LSB) in the equatorial region and directly, without a LSB, in the polar region. The extent of the LSB shrinks while the region of direct transition near the poles increases with an increase in $Re$ . A LSB forms on the non-seam side of the ball in the RS regime. A secondary vortex is observed in the wake bubble. While it exists on the non-seam side for the entire range of $Re$ considered, the mixing in the flow introduced by the seam causes it to disappear beyond a certain $Re$ on the seam side. The pressure difference between the seam and non-seam sides sets up wing-tip-like vortices. Their polarity reverses with the switch from the CS to RS regime.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parekh et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: