Many existing datacenter transports perform one-shot packet priority tagging at end-hosts and leave them fixed during the packet's transmission. In this paper, we experimentally show that: (1) such fixed packet priority is not sufficient for FCT (flow completion time) minimization, and (2) adjusting packet transmission priority in the network requires effective coordination among switches. Building on these insights, we present Anole, a new datacenter transport that advocates packet re-prioritization in near-bottleneck switches to minimize FCT. To this end, Anole integrates three simple-yet-effective techniques. First, it employs an in-network telemetry (INT) based approach to dynamically detect the bottleneck for each flow. Second, it adopts an on-off rate control mechanism for each sender to pause heavily congested flows but send lightly- and non-congested ones. Last, it leverages an altruistic scheduling policy at each switch to let the flows whose next hops are bottleneck switches give way to others. We implement an Anole prototype based on DPDK and show, through both testbed experiments and simulations, that Anole delivers significant performance advantages. For example, compared to EPN, Homa, and Aeolus, it shortens the average FCT of all (small) flows by up to 61.6% (89.1%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: