Retrospective multi-center study demonstrates improved metastatic risk stratification in lower-staged cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, highlighting personalized guidance for adjuvant therapy.
Introduction- The development of metastases has a profound impact on cSCC patient survival. Lower-stage tumors are those that lack factors that portend higher risk for disease progression and therefore not typically considered for increased surveillance or treatment. However, up to one-third of all metastatic events have been reported for patients originally staged as T1. The 40-GEP test is validated to accurately classify risk for regional and/or distant metastasis in patients with primary cSCC with at least one high-risk factor. The current study investigated whether the 40-GEP test could independently improve identification of lower-staged tumors at increased risk of metastasis. Methods- In an IRB-approved, retrospective, multi-center study, primary tumor tissue and associated clinical data from patients with cSCC and one or more clinicopathologic risk factors (n=897) were collected. Within this overall cohort, lower Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) T-staged samples (n=444 T1 and n=335 T2a) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to determine metastasis-free survival (MFS) according to 40-GEP risk class (Class 1-low metastatic risk; Class 2A-higher risk; Class 2B-highest risk). Results- There was a total of 118 metastatic events in the overall cohort, of which 25% (29/118) and 38% (45/118) occurred in BWH T1 and T2a, respectively. BWH T1 tumors had an overall event rate of 6.5% (29/444), with T1/Class 2B tumors having a 5.1-fold increased event rate of 33.3%. BWH T2a tumors had an overall event rate of 13.4% (45/335), with T2a/Class 2B tumors having a 2.7-fold increased event rate of 36.4%. Stratification by the 40-GEP test resulted in significantly different metastasis rates across all three 40-GEP classes within both the T1 and T2a subsets (log-rank tests, p<0.0001 each subset). Conclusion- Within a cohort of cSCC patients considered lower risk by current staging alone, the 40-GEP identified patients with a substantial increase in metastatic risk. The observed rates of metastasis over 10% and 20% are clinically actionable for nodal staging or postoperative adjuvant radiation, respectively. Combining clinicopathologic risk assessment with individual biologic risk, as provided by the 40-GEP test, improves the accuracy of risk assessment used clinically as the basis of treatment decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Somani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: