Building upon the exact methods presented in our earlier work [J. Complexity, 2022], we introduce a heuristic approach for the star discrepancy subset selection problem. The heuristic gradually improves the current-best subset by replacing one of its elements at a time. While the heuristic does not necessarily return an optimal solution, we obtain very promising results for all tested dimensions. For example, for moderate sizes 30≤n≤240, we obtain point sets in dimension 6 with L∞ star discrepancy up to 35% better than that of the first n points of the Sobol' sequence. Our heuristic works in all dimensions, the main limitation being the precision of the discrepancy calculation algorithms. We provide a comparison with a recent energy functional introduced by Steinerberger [J. Complexity, 2019], showing that our heuristic performs better on all tested instances. Finally, our results and complementary experiments also give further empirical information on inverse star discrepancy conjectures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clément et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: