Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 16, 2024Science of Remote SensingOpen Access

Accuracy comparison of terrestrial and airborne laser scanning and manual measurements for stem curve-based growth measurements of individual trees

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

VSValtteri SoininenEHEric HyyppäJMJesse Muhojoki

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Soininen et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73b96b6db6435876b51dbhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2024.100125
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Accuracy Assessment of Field and Airborne Laser Scanning–Derived Individual Tree Inventories using Felled Tree Measurements and Log Scaling Data in a Mixed Conifer Forest2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Benchmarking Under- and Above-Canopy Laser Scanning Solutions for Deriving Stem Curve and Volume in Easy and Difficult Boreal Forest Conditions2024 · 23 citations
  3. 3Terrestrial laser scanning in forestry: Accuracy and efficiency in measuring individual tree parameters2025
  4. 4Terrestrial Laser Scanning in Forestry: Accuracy and Efficiency in Measuring Individual Tree Structural Parameters2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Integrating personal laser scanning with uncrewed aerial vehicle-based photogrammetry or laser scanning for accurate stem volume estimation in temperate coniferous forests2024