The active component of copper-based materials for electrocatalytic nitrate reduction to ammonia (NRA) remains unclear due to the susceptibility of oxidation of copper. Using density functional theory calculations, NRA pathways are evaluated on low-index crystal surfaces Cu2O (111), CuO (111), and Cu (111) at different pH. Cu2O (111), with abundant undercoordinated Cu atoms on the surface, shows easier adsorption of NO3– than Cu (111) or CuO (111). NRA on CuO (111) is hindered by the large ΔG of adsorption of NO3– and hydrogenation of *NO. Thus, Cu (111) and Cu2O (111) contribute most to the NRA activity while CuO (111) is inert. Three key steps of NRA on copper-based catalysts are identified: adsorption of NO3–, *NO → *NOH/*NHO, and *NH3 desorption, as the three can be rate-determining steps depending on the local environment. Moreover, previous experimentally detected NH2OH on copper-based catalysts may come from the NRA on Cu2O (111) as the most probable pathway on Cu2O (111) is NO3– → *NO3 → *NO2 → *NO → *NHO → *NHOH → *NH2OH → *NH2 → *NH3 → *NH3(g). At high reduction potential, CuOx would be reduced into Cu, so the effective active substance for NRA in a strong reduction environment is Cu.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: