The 18 O enrichment (Δ 18 O) of cellulose (Δ 18 O Cel ) is recognized as a unique archive of past climate and plant function. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the proportion of oxygen in cellulose ( p ex ) that exchanges post‐photosynthetically with medium water of cellulose synthesis. Particularly, recent research with C 3 grasses demonstrated that the Δ 18 O of leaf sucrose (Δ 18 O Suc , the parent substrate for cellulose synthesis) can be much higher than predicted from daytime Δ 18 O of leaf water (Δ 18 O LW ), which could alter conclusions on photosynthetic versus post‐photosynthetic effects on Δ 18 O Cel via p ex . Here, we assessed p ex in leaves of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne ) grown at different atmospheric relative humidity (RH) and CO 2 levels, by determinations of Δ 18 O Cel in leaves, Δ 18 O LGDZW (the Δ 18 O of water in the leaf growth‐and‐differentiation zone) and both Δ 18 O Suc and Δ 18 O LW (adjusted for ε bio , the biosynthetic fractionation between water and carbohydrates) as alternative proxies for the substrate for cellulose synthesis. Δ 18 O LGDZW was always close to irrigation water, and p ex was similar (0.53 ± 0.02 SE) across environments when determinations were based on Δ 18 O Suc . Conversely, p ex was erroneously and variably underestimated (range 0.02–0.44) when based on Δ 18 O LW . The photosynthetic signal fraction in Δ 18 O Cel is much more constant than hitherto assumed, encouraging leaf physiological reconstructions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabrera et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: