Background: Clinically cutaneous vasculitis can present with a panoply of morphologies which include urticaria, purpura, hemorrhagic vesicles, ulcers, nodules, livedo, infarcts, and/ or digital gangrene. The classication of cutaneous vasculitis is best approached morphologically by determining vessel size and principal inammatory response. These histological ndings when coupled with direct immunouorescence examination, Antineutrophilic Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA) status and ndings from work-up for systemic disease, allow for specic diagnosis, and ultimately, more effective therapy. A prospective observational study was conducted wh Methods: ich included 50 patients for a duration of 18 months. The demographic data like age, sex and detailed clinical history like site, size, morphology, duration of lesion, signicant medical history, investigations and clinical diagnosis were noted. The histopathological examination of skin biopsy was done on Hematoxylin and Eosin (H and E) stains and Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS ) stain in a few cases. Out of 50 cases, majority of the patients were in the age group of 21-30 Results: years and male to female ratio was 1.08:1. Most common site of lesion was lower extremities seen in 88% of patients. On histopathological examination, most common type of vasculitis found was leukocytoclastic vasculitis (74%), followed by lymphocytic vasculitis (18%), granulomatous vasculitis (6%) and 1 case of eosinophilic vasculitis (2%). The histopathologic Conclusion: al examination of skin biopsy plays a valuable role in the process of arriving at the nal diagnosis, knowing the severity of the lesion and conrming the clinical diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agale et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: