March 15, 2024RUDN Journal of Language Studies Semiotics and SemanticsOpen Access

Bakhtin’s Philosophical Anthropology in Translation: Rhetoric Devices and Text Cohesion

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

NBNatalia S. BruffaertsUniversité Gaston Berger SMSvetlana MoskvitchevaPeoples' Friendship University of Russia

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Comparative analysis reveals diverging rhetorical and cohesive strategies in French and English translations of Bakhtin, highlighting the role of coreferential models.

Key Points

Translators alter Mikhail Bakhtin’s philosophical anthropology through divergent structural strategies, shifting from French ellipsis to English amplification.
Comparative perspective analysis of the essay Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity examines text cohesion across French 1984 and English 1990 published translations.
Highlights that coreferential models govern the conceptual organization of theoretical prose, showing how translation choices influence Bakhtin’s legacy in literary theory.

Cite This Study

Bruffaerts et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e73edbb6db6435876b8d20 https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-1-64-77

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Comparative analysis reveals diverging rhetorical and cohesive strategies in French and English translations of Bakhtin, highlighting the role of coreferential models.

Bakhtin’s Philosophical Anthropology in Translation: Rhetoric Devices and Text Cohesion

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Bakhtin’s Philosophical Anthropology in Translation: Rhetoric Devices and Text Cohesion

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider