Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The advent of low-code and no-code platforms has transformed software development by allowing quick application creation with minimum manual coding. The growing low-code and no-code platform options allow non-professional developers to quickly build applications but also pose significant issues in maintaining effective quality control. Conventional human code review methods are comprehensive but typically require a lot of resources and slow down the fast development speed promoted by low-code and no-code platforms. This study explores the incorporation of several machine learning methods into low-code and no-code platforms to automate code review, quality evaluation, and error identification, ultimately improving development speed and application quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choudhury et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: