Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Current therapies for high-grade TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasms (≥ 10% blasts) do not offer a meaningful survival benefit except allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the minority who achieve a complete response to first line therapy (CR1). To identify reliable pre-therapy predictors of response and outcomes, we assembled a cohort of 234 individuals with well-annotated clinical, molecular and pathology data, evaluating CR1 & 24-month survival (OS24). In this elderly cohort (median age 68.0 years) with 73.4% receiving frontline non-intensive regimens (hypomethylating agents with or without venetoclax), we identified several novel factors predictive of inferior CR1 including male gender (P = .019), ≥ 2 autosomal monosomies (P < .001), -17/17p (P = .008), multi-hit TP53 allelic state (P < .001) and CUX1 alterations (P = .009). Inferior OS24 was predicated by ≥ 2 monosomies (P = .004), TP53 VAF>25% (P < .001), and TP53 splice junction mutations (P = .007). In addition, mutations/deletions in any of six genes including CUX1, U2AF1, epigenetic regulators (EZH2, TET2), or RAS pathway genes (CBL, KRAS) (termed 'EPI6' signature) predicted inferior OS24 (HR = 2.0 [1.5-2.8]; P < .0001). A risk score incorporating these accessible binary factors in a multivariable model stratified 3 prognostic distinct groups: favorable, intermediate, and poor with significantly different median (15.4, 9.2, 3.5 months) and 24-month (48.4%, 14.3%, 0.5%) survival (OS24) (P < .0001). For the first time, in a seemingly monolithic high-risk cohort, our data provides means to tease out small subgroups at baseline with superior or very poor outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaur et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: